What is Process Feedback?

Process Feedback offers insight into how students write and do their work.

Process Feedback helps shift the conversation from AI detection to process improvement

What is Process Feedback?

For each piece of student work, Process Feedback produces a writing process report that shows the steps the student took to complete it. Many teachers use Process Feedback in their classrooms to discourage student cheating. While academic integrity is important, Process Feedback's true objective is to show how students actually do their work, so teachers and students can talk about that process together. Discussing and reflecting on the process helps students become reflective thinkers.

Some key points about Process Feedback:

  • It was started by Associate Professor Dr. Badri Adhikari in the Department of Computer Science at the University of Missouri-St. Louis.
  • It is backed by several peer-reviewed research articles, including the first one published in 2023 in Education Sciences.
  • It is actively used by 100,000+ students and teachers in 100+ countries.
  • It is 100% free for teachers and students, with institutional agreements available with subscriptions.
  • It neither promotes nor discourages AI use. It works regardless of a classroom's AI policy.

How it works and where it works

Process Feedback offers several ways to integrate it in a classroom. Students can keep writing where they already write or choose our online editor.

Some ways to generate a writing process report:

Flowchart of how Process Feedback works, from a student writing to a shared writing process report

Student privacy: students stay in control

Asking students to share their writing process raises fair privacy questions. For example, a student may notice that most of their writing happened late at night, and that insight may be meant for their own reflection rather than for evaluation. Process Feedback is built with that concern in mind.

Diagram showing writing process data stored locally in the student's own browser

Instead of collecting every student's report by default, teachers can:

  • Encourage students to review their own reports privately, before anything is submitted
  • Assign reflection prompts and collect the reflections instead of the report itself
  • Ask for the report only when a conversation calls for it, not by default
Read the Teacher Guide

From 'Did you cheat?' to 'How did you do this?'

The most common question about student work has become 'Did you cheat?' It is a question that puts teachers in the role of investigator and students in the role of suspect, and nobody learns much from the exchange.

A writing process report changes the question to 'How did you do this?' Students can show their effort instead of defending it, teachers can see who is struggling while there is still time to help, and when AI was part of the work, the conversation can be about using it well rather than about whether it was used at all.

Why Use Process Feedback

Built for institutional review

When a school, district, college, or university needs a formal deployment, an institutional agreement covers it: a signed Data Privacy Agreement, documentation for procurement review, scheduled audits, deployment support, and teacher training.

Institution icon next to a checklist report, representing institutional requirements

What institutional review teams usually ask about:

  • A signed DPA or DSA, plus VPAT and HECVAT documentation for procurement
  • Alignment with FERPA and COPPA in the U.S., GDPR in the EU, and the Australian Privacy Principles
  • A zero-data-collection tier for extensions and plugins, verified by scheduled audits
  • A governed tier for LTI integration, with region-specific hosting available
Download Brochure (PDF)

It simply reveals the writing process data

  • We neither endorse nor oppose students using AI—our technology simply reveals the steps a student took to complete their work. You decide how to use these insights.
  • We believe that a student's working process matters, regardless of whether AI is involved.
  • Assigning students to reflect on their working process fosters metacognitive thinking. Feel free to use our sample assignment to guide such a reflection.
  • Feedback on the process should be context-specific, which is why we don't provide explicit evaluations. Instead, we make it easier to offer or acquire meaningful process feedback.
Group of teachers discussing with laptop on table.

See it for yourself

Start with a sample student report to see what the tool actually shows. If you would rather ask questions first, join one of our monthly teacher webinars or write to us directly.